Parent Perspectives on the Child Experience of Pediatric Home Ventilation via Tracheostomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Parents facing the decision of whether to initiate pediatric mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy ("home ventilation") report wanting information about what to expect for life at home for their child. The study objective is to explore parent descriptions of the child experience of home ventilation to increase awareness for clinicians in the inpatient setting caring for these children. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted using purposive sampling of parents with children who initiated home ventilation within the previous 5 years from 3 geographically diverse academic medical centers. RESULTS: We interviewed 21 families from 3 geographic regions in the United States. About 75% of children had respiratory failure in the first year of life, 80% had medical complexity, and half had severe neurologic impairment. Five domains emerged regarding parent perceptions of their child's experience of home ventilation: (1) health and well-being; (2) development; (3) adaptation; (4) mobility and travel; and (5) relationships. Within each domain, several themes were identified. For each theme, there was a positive and negative subtheme to illustrate how the child's experience was modified by home ventilation. Parent descriptions were generally positive, however, in all domains and to varying degrees, parents expressed negative aspects of home ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: By providing information about the realistic experiences of children using home ventilation, clinicians can support families in the inpatient setting as they face this complex decision. Balanced information about home ventilation is critical to enhancing clinician counseling so that families may benefit from the perspectives of experienced parents.

Interpersonal Influences on the Choice to Treat Nausea during Pregnancy with Medication or Cannabis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to better understand the interpersonal influences on a pregnant individual's decision of how to treat nausea and vomiting during pregnancy using a qualitative approach. STUDY DESIGN: A semistructured interview guide was developed to assess pregnancy symptoms, decision-making regarding treating nausea, and interpersonal influences on treatment decisions. Interviews were conducted with 17 individuals enrolled in a neuroimaging and behavioral study of prenatal exposure to cannabis who used medication and/or cannabis to treat symptoms associated with pregnancy. RESULTS: Interviews revealed four groups of stakeholders who influenced participant decision-making: medical providers, partners, family, and friends. Influence was categorized as either positive, negative, neutral, or absent (if not discussed or participant chose not to disclose). Those in the medication group reported only positive or neutral feedback from friends, family, partners, and providers. In contrast, the cannabis group participants reported positive feedback from friends, mixed feedback from family and partners, and negative feedback from providers, which was often felt to be stigmatizing. Many in the cannabis group also reported varying feedback from different medical providers. While the cannabis group frequently reported eliciting feedback from friends, family, and partners, the medication group often did not. CONCLUSION: Medication group participants reported entirely positive feedback from providers and often did not mention any feedback at all from partners, family, and friends. Cannabis group participants reported much more varied feedback, both positive and negative, from a variety of interpersonal contacts and sometimes decided to conceal their treatment choice after receiving or fearing negative feedback. We recommend further research into the health outcomes of pregnant patients who chose not to discuss their treatment decisions with providers, family, partners, or friends. We also suggest further study of possible reasons behind a lack of disclosure, including fear of stigma and/or legal consequences. KEY POINTS: · Providers, partners, family, friends gave feedback.. · Medication group got positive feedback.. · Cannabis group stigmatized by providers.. · Cannabis group got mixed feedback..

"What Would Give Her the Best Life?": Understanding Why Families Decline Pediatric Home Ventilation.

Background: Families who must decide about pediatric home ventilation rely on the clinicians who counsel them for guidance. Most studies about pediatric home ventilation decisions focus on families who opt for this intervention, leaving much unknown about the families who decline. Objective: To describe the rationales of families who decline home ventilation. Design: Semi-structured interview study. Setting/Subjects: We interviewed 16 families in hospitals across 3 U.S. states, identified by their clinicians as previously deciding to not pursue home ventilation via tracheostomy within the past five years. Measurements: Targeted content and narrative analyses were used to understand family intentions and reasons for declining. Results: The clinical and social context varied among the 16 families in this study. Families' intentions in saying "no" fell into two categories: (1) definitive "No": Families who stood firm on in their decision and (2) contingent "No": Families who may consider this in the future. Families described four reasons why their child did not receive home ventilation: (1) concern about medical impacts, (2) concern about physical and/or communication restrictions, (3) concern that there would be no clear health benefit, and (4) concern about no clear meaningful life. Most families mentioned all four reasons, but concern about no clear meaningful life predominated. Conclusions: Though these families did not see home ventilation as an appropriate option, each reported a complex interplay of intentions behind and reasons for declining. Clinicians who counsel families about home ventilation could share the reasons that families commonly decline this intervention to facilitate a balanced discussion.